Regression testing helps development teams validate that the existing functionality of their product still works when they fix bugs or add new features. Typically, these tests are kicked off as part of a continuous integration (CI) process so that if anything broke based on their new commits, the engineers know very quickly. The hope is that these tests will ensure quality of the user experience along with the new changes.
Given new application architectures including microservices, where individual services are decoupled into small, individual components, regression testing has become even more important since unit testing rarely catches code dependencies for a new feature that runs across one or more microservice.
However, regression testing presents many challenges. Some of the biggest are:
These types of challenges, formed by the time and work limits of humans, are exactly what machine learning was built for and why mabl incorporates machine learning to improve its regression testing. As mabl is testing applications, lots of data is collected outside the basic test steps, including test run time, page load times, and screenshots showing visual changes in the app. This data in turn trains machine learning models which are used to notify teams when something changes - both for the bad or the good.
Let’s take a look.
We're frequently adding new automatic regressions based on user feedback. One of the newest regressions is visual differences. Since mabl captures screenshots of every step of your journey, mabl can build a model of your app that automatically compares these screenshots to earlier ones to detect visual changes. You'll then get a notification about exactly where on the page the change was detected.
With machine learning, mabl is making regression testing easier for software teams by not forcing them to comb through test history to find discrepancies in the visual state of their app or painstakingly compare test execution times.
Use mabl to test your app free for 21 days - sign up for an account: